Better Dead Clean, Than Alive Unclean

Bruce R. McConkie’s statement in Mormon Doctrine—”Loss of virtue is too great a price to pay even for the preservation of one’s life—better dead clean, than alive unclean”—is deeply problematic and reflects harmful ideologies surrounding purity culture. By equating virtue exclusively with chastity and suggesting that death is preferable to “uncleanness” (interpreted as loss of virginity, even through rape), McConkie perpetuates dangerous narratives.

Loss of virtue is too great a price to pay even for the preservation of one’s life-better dead clean, than alive unclean.
Bruce R. McConkie, LDS Apostle, Mormon Doctrine
https://ia902606.us.archive.org/32/items/MormonDoctrine1966/MormonDoctrine1966.pdf

Blame the Victim: This view places an unjust burden of guilt on survivors of sexual violence, implying that their worth is diminished through no fault of their own.
Overemphasize Sexual Purity: The statement reflects an unhealthy fixation on sexual “purity” as the sole determinant of moral or spiritual value, overshadowing the broader aspects of individual worth and resilience.
Ignore Trauma: The suggestion fails to account for the psychological and emotional trauma victims endure, compounding their suffering by framing their survival as somehow “unclean.”

Many is the faithful Latter-day Saint parent who has sent a son or a daughter on a mission or otherwise out into the world with the direction: "I would rather have you come back in a pine box with your virtue than return alive without it." - Bruce R. McConkie, LDS Apostle, Mormon Doctrine, 1958 | wasmormon.org — Many is the faithful Latter-day Saint parent who has sent a son or a daughter on a mission or otherwise out into the world with the direction: “I would rather have you come back in a pine box with your virtue than return alive without it.” – Bruce R. McConkie, LDS Apostle, Mormon Doctrine, 1958

Many is the faithful Latter-day Saint parent who has sent a son or a daughter on a mission or otherwise out into the world with the direction: “I would rather have you come back in a pine box with your virtue than return alive without it.”
Bruce R. McConkie, LDS Apostle, Mormon Doctrine
https://ia902606.us.archive.org/32/items/MormonDoctrine1966/MormonDoctrine1966.pdf

McConkie’s follow-up statement magnifies the harm of his earlier assertion that death is preferable to a loss of sexual “virtue.” He praises the purity culture of the church membership and elevates death above transgressing sexually or being abused. This rhetoric is steeped in purity culture, placing undue emphasis on chastity as the ultimate measure of personal and spiritual worth. Several critical issues arise from this perspective such as harmful pressure on youth, victim-blaming, and distorted priorities.

Should parents value a child’s chastity above their very life? This perspective creates immense psychological pressure which leads to unhealthy levels of guilt, shame, and fear among youth navigating a world where sexual violence and/or mistakes occur. The language disregards the importance of survival, healing, and personal growth after trauma or human error.

The purity culture fails to distinguish between consensual sexual activity and sexual violence, which is particularly alarming. Victims of sexual assault may internalize the idea that they are “better off dead,” compounding their trauma and potentially leading to devastating mental health consequences, including self-harm or suicide.

The focus on chastity above life is a troubling distortion of ethical and moral priorities. Life, resilience, and love should be celebrated over rigid dogmas about sexual behavior. This perspective often alienates members who feel they can’t meet these impossible standards of “virtue.”

These statementz align with purity culture that shames individuals for sexual experiences outside of marriage, even in cases of assault. This is not an isolated perspective among a single church leader but an example of a unified message for generations. Such rhetoric marginalizes and silences survivors, leaving them with profound feelings of shame and isolation. This perspective, while tied tightly to Mormonism with the claim that sexual sin is next to murder, disregards the central Christian principle of grace, compassion, and the intrinsic worth of individuals irrespective of their experiences. Though in the Miracle of Forgiveness book, written by Church President, Spencer W. Kimball, the same damaging rhetoric is preached. He states that it’s better to die “defending one’s virtue than to live having lost it.”

"It is better to die in defending one's virtue than to live having lost it without a struggle." - Spencer W. Kimball, The Miracle of Forgiveness, 1969 | wasmormon.org — “It is better to die in defending one’s virtue than to live having lost it without a struggle.” – Spencer W. Kimball, The Miracle of Forgiveness, 1969

"The victim must do all in his or her power to stop the abuse. Most often, the victim is innocent because of being disabled by fear or the power or authority of the offender. At some point in time, however, the Lord may prompt a victim to recognize a degree of responsibility for abuse. Your priesthood leader will help assess your responsibility so that, if needed, it can be addressed. Otherwise the seeds of guilt will remain and sprout into bitter fruit. Yet no matter what degree of responsibility, from absolutely none to increasing consent, the healing power of the atonement of Jesus Christ can provide a complete cure." - Elder Richard G. Scott, Healing the Tragic Scars of Abuse, General Conference April 1992 | wasmormon.org — “The victim must do all in his or her power to stop the abuse. Most often, the victim is innocent because of being disabled by fear or the power or authority of the offender. At some point in time, however, the Lord may prompt a victim to recognize a degree of responsibility for abuse. Your priesthood leader will help assess your responsibility so that, if needed, it can be addressed. Otherwise the seeds of guilt will remain and sprout into bitter fruit. Yet no matter what degree of responsibility, from absolutely none to increasing consent, the healing power of the atonement of Jesus Christ can provide a complete cure.” – Elder Richard G. Scott, Healing the Tragic Scars of Abuse, General Conference April 1992

Statements like these are emblematic of the dangers of purity culture within the Latter-day Saint community. The emphasis on sexual purity often comes at the expense of compassion, grace, and the gospel’s core message of redemption and forgiveness. Additionally, this mindset can perpetuate silence and stigma around issues like sexual violence, preventing open conversations and healing.

Religious leaders and communities should foster an environment that emphasizes unconditional love, empathy, and individual worth over rigid purity standards. Survivors of sexual violence should never feel their value is diminished by experiences outside their control. The idea that life is only worth living if one is sexually “pure” is a tragic misrepresentation of any compassionate theology. By critically examining harmful statements like McConkie’s, faith communities can evolve to become spaces where healing, dignity, and love take precedence over outdated and harmful purity constructs. The harmful implications of this perspective show the need for religious communities to evolve in their treatment of sexual violence and survivors.

The rhetoric of leaders equating sexual purity with personal worth and even life itself perpetuates harmful shame and unrealistic expectations within the Mormon Church. Such teachings have contributed to a dangerous purity culture that undervalues individual dignity, particularly in the context of trauma and personal mistakes. It’s time to rise above this harmful narrative, embrace a more compassionate and inclusive perspective, and reject messages that prioritize rigid standards of “virtue” over love, healing, and grace.

For those who have struggled under the weight of these teachings, sharing your story can be a powerful way to challenge the silence and bring about change. By voicing your experiences, you not only reclaim your personal narrative but also inspire others to question harmful ideologies and foster empathy within the community. Consider sharing your journey of faith, healing, or deconstruction at wasmormon.org to help build a collective voice for change and understanding. Together, we can advocate for a healthier, more compassionate approach to faith and personal growth.

More reading: