Skip to content
  • Join
  • Login
wasmormon.org

wasmormon.org

Stories of mormon faith transitions. Share your truth – own your story!

  • Profiles
  • Create Profile
  • Questions
  • Blog
  • About

Hey, I'm Tom

I was a mormon.

Thomas E. Donofrio profile image for wasmormon.org
  • Facebook

About me

I have a two year technical degree from Gateway Community College in Phoenix, Arizona. I work in the ammonia refrigeration industry and hold a national certification in that field. I'm also the author of Book of Mormon Tories part 1: web.archive.org/web/20161022051430/http://www.postmormon.org/exp_e/index.php/magazine/pmm_article_full_text/… and part 2: youtube.com/… which documents early American influences on the production of the Book of Mormon. See also my writings about "Early American Influences on the Book of Mormon" at the mormon think website: mormonthink.com/…

On my shelf

  • historicity of book of mormon
  • Infallibility Complex
  • the church's gaslighting practices
  • Book of Mormon anachronisms
  • science
  • Book of Abraham Translation
  • peep stones

# Why I left More stories of 'Why I left' the Mormon church

I have a two year technical degree from Gateway Community College in Phoenix, Arizona. I work in the ammonia refrigeration industry and hold a national certification in that field.

It does not qualify me as a Book of Mormon scholar. Then again, it does not take a scholar to defeat the Book of Mormon, or the believers and apologists that support it.

Even the First Presidency of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints defeat their own scholars by making no official endorsement of any of the contrived "evidence" offered by LDS apologists that infer the Book of Mormon is valid. Any apologist organization of the Church, official or arm chair, hedges their articles and contributions with disclaimers that the opinion stated is that of the author alone.

The hesitant lack of an official endorsement is the worst indictment of all.

The Brethren, as they are sometimes referred to, appeal rather to faith and prayer over real world evidence (or lack thereof) as the ultimate authority to determine the authenticity of the Book of Mormon. In actuality, they really don't have much of a choice. In this they are safe since subjective methods of faith and prayer cannot be scientifically scrutinized.

Which begs the question; why have Book of Mormon apologists in the first place? If the Brethren trump BYU scholars then of what use are BYU scholars? They do serve a purpose. They serve as human shields for the Brethren, running a game of interference when faith and prayer fail. They give new meaning to the term "college try". They can try to bolster the faith of the questioning Saint. "Hey, if those smart college guys believe it, then they must be on to something! Look at all the evidence they have come up with!" At least, they can give the impression of working on the problem.

And a problem it is. There are no Book of Mormon gold plates or reformed Egyptian language in existence from which a comparative analysis can be made. Mormon scholars cannot adequately describe the actual translation method (a generous term when applied to Joseph Smith). Translating by "the gift and power of God" has a much more appealing sound than the method of looking at a magic stone in a hat. Mormon scholars cannot even agree to the geography of where in the Americas the story took place.

Ironically, absent of the most crucial of evidence we are then asked by them to consider their peripheral evidence. Perhaps this works for believers. However, when the need to believe in the Book of Mormon is removed it is easily seen as a product of its time. The fact that it speaks of divinity does not make it divine. When read in context of the 19th century social landscape the Book of Mormon story becomes a melodrama of the era. When compared to verbiage and text of contemporary works the Book of Mormon emerges as an amalgam of political and religious sermon.

It's simple really.

Spotlight on Thomas E. Donofrio

  • "I have a two year technical degree and work in the ammonia refrigeration industry and hold a national certification in that field. It does not qualify me as a Book of Mormon scholar. Then again, it does not take a scholar to defeat the Book of Mormon, or the believers and apologists that support it. I was a Mormon." - Tom Donofrio | https://wasmormon.org/profile/thomasdonofrio/
  • "Even the First Presidency of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints defeat their own scholars by making no official endorsement of any of the contrived "evidence" offered by LDS apologists that infer the Book of Mormon is valid. Any apologist organization of the Church, official or arm chair, hedges their articles and contributions with disclaimers that the opinion stated is that of the author alone. The hesitant lack of an official endorsement is the worst indictment of all." - Tom Donofrio | https://wasmormon.org/profile/thomasdonofrio/
  • "The Brethren, as they are sometimes referred to, appeal rather to faith and prayer over real world evidence (or lack thereof) as the ultimate authority to determine the authenticity of the Book of Mormon. In actuality, they really don't have much of a choice. In this they are safe since subjective methods of faith and prayer cannot be scientifically scrutinized. Which begs the question; why have Book of Mormon apologists in the first place?" - Tom Donofrio | https://wasmormon.org/profile/thomasdonofrio/
  • "When the need to believe in the Book of Mormon is removed it is easily seen as a product of its time. The fact that it speaks of divinity does not make it divine. When read in context of the 19th century social landscape the Book of Mormon story becomes a melodrama of the era. When compared to verbiage and text of contemporary works the Book of Mormon emerges as an amalgam of political and religious sermon." - Tom Donofrio | https://wasmormon.org/profile/thomasdonofrio/
  • Read Tom Donofrio's "I was a Mormon" profile at https://wasmormon.org/profile/thomasdonofrio/

Attribution

Originally shared on exmormonscholarstestify.org website. Reposted with permission. exmormonscholarstestify.org/…

  • Share this profile

  • Share link on Facebook
  • Share link on twitter
  • Share link on reddit
  • Share link via email
Contribute your own story
Back to the Directory
Random Profile
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Reddit
  • Bluesky
  • Mastodon
  • Twitter
  • RSS Feed

Register or Log In

Lost your password? Register

Forgotten Password

Cancel

Register For This Site

A password will be e-mailed to you.

Profile Details

Thanks for signing up!

Are you ready to start your profile now? You can always add/update your profile later, and in order to display on the website you’ll still need to complete your account setup and sign in.

Cancel

Subscribe

Sign up to receive the monthly newsletter!
wasmormon.org

Though this site discusses mormonism, topics related to mormons, the mormon church and people who refer to themselves as unorthodox mormons, ex-mormons, post-mormons or any other form of wasmormon, it is not officially affiliated with or managed by The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints or even the Corporation of the Presiding Bishop. They don't want to be called mormon anymore anyways. All of the content, stories or opinions expressed, implied or included in this site are solely credited to those sharing their own personal stories and not those of Intellectual Reserve, Inc. or The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

Privacy Policy
  • Stories
  • Questions
  • Blog
  • Images
  • About
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • How To Help
  • Community Guidelines